Is ‘today’s woman’ impacting ‘today’s Ad- space’?
Monojit Lahiri wonders whether the ‘New Woman’ is appropriately reflected in adland or…
Once, not very long ago, women portrayed in advertising reflected all the pristine virtues of Nirupa Roy — aka, Mother Earth! Eternally sacrificing, unconditionally loving, caring and forgiving, she was the definitive 24×7 giver, wanting (or expecting) nothing in return except the well-being of her family. Excuse me, but what about her life, needs, wants, dreams, desires and aspirations? “What dreams, drives, desires are you babbling about, dummy? What crap are you letting fly, you regressive moron? She is a mother, okay and this is her life, okay?!” hisses a seven-star chauvinist pig!
Today, as we bogey towards the end of ‘07, has this Stone Age projection of women in adville moved on? Is it keeping pace with times? Is it more real, contemporary, authentic? Is the new Indian woman — cool, confident, aspirational, successful, multi-tasking — coming through or is Adville hemming and hawing, paying lip-service, indulging in tokenism, playing safe by re-enforcing the stereotypes?
Voices and opinions differ. Young ad person Dolly Jha believes that too little is done towards it. For every Frankfinn ad, there are a whole clutch of stuff depicting women as bimbos and sex objects. “The male-specific product category are the worst offenders — gutkas, shaving creams, deos, Maruti SX4 – pushing the pseudo-sophisticated button to up the ante. Disgusting!”
Journo Roma Kapadia disagrees. “Firstly, change doesn’t happen overnight; it takes time. Secondly, advertising is neither about morality nor approximating reality in a manner that makes everyone happy. It is a seductive marketing tool with a one-point programme — to sell! The guys behind these ads are not dumb. They are professionals who have a very tough job to do in a competitive market place. Surely they know what they are doing” Overall, she believes that Adville is on the right path.
Roma could be right. Smart n’ sassy gals in tees; Young, bright and attractive women scoring brownie points in the boardrooms; Independent young lasses choosing their life-partners or colour of Scooties, in style; Girlie gangs whooping it up — or being wooed by romantic hubbies play-acting as “chefs”… all these images are flashing across present day ad content on TV.
Grey worldwide’s NCD Priti Nair agrees. She believes there has been a dramatic shift from woman-as-doormat to woman-as-achiever. “There is more life, positivity, energy and drive in the way she is projected. The young modern mother is bright, active and peppy. She is pro-active, not re-active!” Swapan Seth of Equs Red Cell begs to differ. “I really don’t know from where all this is coming from! Today’s woman is most certainly being stifled and gagged in a world of stereotypes. At best the stuff mentioned are surface shifts providing glamorous distractions. Marketers seem to be continents away from confronting real — edgy, uneasy, controversial, troubled — social shifts. Where is the single, successful, strong, opinionated, unmarried 35-year old woman? Where is the positive, cheerful, smart, successful single mother whipping up a tasty meal for her excited small kids? That calls for a courageous client and braveheart agency!” Young and attractive executive of a high profile fashion house, Tania Haldar brings her own perspective to the table. “It’s a given that a pretty face with the right — ahem — equipment can sell almost anything! Savvy ad film-makers cash in on this regularly, using air brush techniques to wash away in essentials like a thick waistline or skin blemishes and before you know it, voila! You have the perfect babe selling you a host of products — perfumes, cosmetics, fairness creams, detergents, mobiles, shoes, home appliances, inner wear, washing machines, electronic goods, cars, holiday resorts — that works.” However, Haldar laments the fact that if and when serious, decision making and meaningful issues need to be forcefully publicised (Insurance, education, social issues like woman empowerment, girl child, adult literacy, HIV Aids) today’s woman, sadly, is nowhere to be found! Does that mean that she is perceived as someone incapable of influencing popular imagination when something solid needs to be ‘pushed’ (where are you, YAWN Shabana Azmi and Nandita Das) used only for frivolous consumer items? If that is so, how much justice is today’s Adville really doing to representation of today’s woman, which reaches consumers?
So what gives? Being cautious, maintaining the status-quo, playing safe… willing to wound but afraid to strike… is that the real situation? It’s a tough call. At one level, there has certainly been a conscious effort to keep pace with the new woman. However (as Swapan perceptively points out) to go the road less travelled, be bold, audacious and break new ground by embracing uncomfortable (and unspoken) real life issues in terms of contemporary realities is — alas —something that is, almost, zilch.
Our guess is that it has to do with comfort levels, not wanting to rock the boat, being happy by making all the right noises at the right forums – and most importantly, yelling the famous lines is complacent self-defence: Why mend it if it ain’t broke, babe… right?









